Following on from yesterday, Dear Reader…
*Don’t mind me saying, Clicky, butt sumtimes… you’re kinda fucking weird…*
Distracted…I get it.
Part and Particle…I get it.
^The Jacksons – Can You Feel It (Official Music Video HD)^
Got to have a damn good conversation right in the big middle of writing this.
As a result…my brain is siting on empty. Or, emptier. More emptier?
Welp…at least we can assume that thicker/better armor = bigger/better bullets.
^Bulletproof Glass vs 60,000 PSI Waterjet^
Gonna have to summon a story here.
A story from “A Veiled Gazelle: Seeing How To See” by Idries Shah.
The story is called “Four Friends”
If you wanna read it…
If you wanna listen to it…
Anyway…long story short, a Sufi moves to a city to open a school. There are three people in this city who are familiar with this Sufi and his work, they all three desire to be students of this Sufi, and the Sufi employs/enlists all three under the auspices of…
The first two are odd enough, but make sense, when you see and understand the the intentions of the Sufi. However, employing someone to be your employer? That’s kind of a weird thought, eh? Anyway…thinking about this story in terms of today’s world and atmosphere and using the vernacular of this time, the Sufi seems like he’s setting up…a conspiracy…eh?
Or is he a teacher who needs to learn in order to teach those that wish to learn? I mean, how else do you learn to teach? Yep…gotta learn how to learn. So invasive, these students are 😛
^deadmau5 – Hyperlandia^
How we apply what we learn seems to be the place where things perpetuate themselves and their eternal via change. Ironic, eh? But not really. I mean…when you learned whatever you learned, there was prolly a change there, yeah? Why would you not expect whatever you learned to change even more when and where you apply it?
And so…percentages suddenly become our friends. But if you really want to jump that train, you’ve got to wrap your head around the concept of gaps and gapping. Some can be bridged, some not. You can do a quick scan back through your own time and get a good bead on what these are rather rapidly. Failed and successful relationships of all kinds in there prolly. Assuming you have been afforded the opportunity that is. Can’t learn much as a corpse in a box.
That said, some gaps cannot nor will not ever be filled. You can prolly relate to this concept as well via the past. But in the percentages model, it always seems to be the one that you think you have a bead on, that causes you to focus on the other end thinking that it can be tamed as well.
EX: 99.9% – 100%. It makes the assumption that you have already correctly calculated the gap to zero(0) on the other end.
The thinking that I’ve been doing lately has me to thinking that neither gap on either end can be accurately calculated. Not in the way and ways it’s being attempted anyway. Lotta folding there that is going twist and create a simultaneousness that suddenly makes discernment as to which end you are at impossible.
Continuing to assume that you remain on the end in which you started is only going to further complicate this confusion. Primarily because, things will begin to simultaneously move so fast and so slow at the same time, that you can no longer discern what is moving and what is not moving.
^The Plimsouls – A Million Miles Away^
Song of Solomon 3 (ESV)
Song of Solomon 3 (KJV)
Lotta differences in those two versions of the same passage. And speaking of passage and passages, a lot time has transpired and transacted during the passage of time between writings of those two versions.
Are we looking for:
D: All of the above?
E: All of the above above?
That’s just my thinking tho.
Anything that we forgo, tends to create a gap.
Almost sounds like a cog turning about a wheel, that is entangled with the cog and cogs of another wheel, eh?
^The Smiths – These things take time^
It’s now Wednesday May 31. I started writing this yesterday, but a conversation I had via Twitter kinda drained me, which resulted in me ranting over at Merovee in order to make sense of…fuck it….whatever….I gots no answers.
Someone made an interesting observation on Twitter about a scientist that appears to be “crossing the streams”…if you will. I tried to go to the story, but got the message above.
"The College Fix" ain't working. lolz
Anyway…yeah…it appears that rigidity is rigid. Especially in the application thereof. Or lack of. To think that physical laws do not apply to the physical objects that they describe seems kinda…weird. Prolly why I operate under the assumption that:
A) any scientific law is equally applicable across the board outside of it’s own definitions, and
B) calling anything “law” is foolhardy in and of itself. Including the temporary states of matter is pointless without simultaneously excluding them.
Yeah…both. Forever and always, in all things, both. It’s going to work itself out as to which is contextually applicable at the time of observation.
But to think that this case will ALWAYS be the case, is neglecting the time and times that allowed you to make the observation in the first place. A lack of understanding of time and times as they behave and operate over time. Yes…it’s quite pesky…this little paradigm of paradox that I submit is equally solvable and unsolvable. 😉
I found a different copy of the story BTW.
^Bow Wow Wow – Do You Wanna Hold Me [HD]^
Did you know that if your spelling is so bad, yet you transpose letters in just the right word, at just the right time, you can sometimes stumble across gems?
I must be thinking about time as it does not relate to the time that I am trying to write about that thought in.
All kinds of mistakes and snafus that wind up teaching us stuff.
^Goldfrapp – Anymore (Official Video)^
I’m not gonna jump on the “I’ve Been Saying This All Along” bandwagon, primarily because I haven’t been saying this all along. I’ve thought about it quite a bit. I’ve espoused it quite a bit in my own personal life. But you don’t know me do you? How could you know me? I don’t expect you to know me. I’m just a fan in the stands cheering you stupid fucks on. Yeah…both teams. Any team. I don’t care what team you are on nor what you are trying to accomplish…I’m cheering you on. Unless I’m not.
If you weren’t chasing your dreams, our paths would never have crossed…right? Ever stopped to consider the possibility that someone exists for the sole purpose of helping others chase and achieve their dreams? That someone could have a dream, and that dream is to help others dream? We all do that from time to time. Mine is just a little more focused in that area. It helps the sting of “those who can’t do, teach” not burn quite so bad.
^Martin Roth – An Analog Guy In A Digital World^
I guess this is a short week for those in the civilized and industrial worlds.
I don't work...so every day is Halloween for me.
I noticed in my recent travels that someone pulled this one out of the hat for some odd reason. Prolly all of the AI and robots talk as of late.
I have no interest in the subject of robotics, which is why I neither write nor talk about it.
I have an inlaw that owns a rather successful robotics company tho.
Success…it’s all around us.
Q: Now what?
^Röyksopp- Alpha male Wolves clip^
What does having successful relatives have to do with me?
I mean…kinda it does…but not really.
As a matter of fact, it has the effect of compounding the nothingness that I already am.
“Less Than Less Than”…in a comparative contextual kinda way.
^The Speakeasy Three – When I Get Low, I Get High – ( Official Video )^
NOW GO THE FUCK AWAY!!!
I'm thinking about doing that myself.
^the smiths, death of a disco dancer, buik remasters^
X: Where ya gonna go?
X: Sounds risky.
X: You sure you wanna travel this path?
B: Allow me here if I may…maybe a course change is order Captain.
T: I have some thoughts.
X: Broken and melty like an ice-cube fired out of a bazooka towards the sun in the Northern Hemisphere during the month of July.
Z: I’m all about accuracy sometimes.
0: No comment.
Cade: rofl…no pointers to be considered there, eh?
Cade: OMG! That’s quite enough references to absurdity.
0: I’m done.
Cade: This is like shooting fish in a barrel.
C: Why would someone shoot fish in a barrel?
Cade: I dunno. How big is the barrel? Can’t you see?
C: Har har.
X: Are you going to invoke size? Or quantity?
Cade: Aren’t they the same?
0: We need a bigger barrel.
Cade: Bigger barrel for bigger fish is indicative of need for a bigger gun.
T: May I suggest…Howitzers?
Cade: Jesus fucking CHRIST!!! What kind of fish are we talking here, and can our lumber industry/industries support such an endeavor?
X: Always a bigger fish.
Cade: I fucking KNEW you were gonna say that!!!
Cade: My comment on Twitter regarding relativity and change was meant to invoke more of a quantity of speed than distance.
X: Why is that?
Cade: Prolly because there was a weird link to something that Roob said in a conversation yesterday.
Z: And what was that, which Roob said, in a conversation, yesterday.
Cade: I can’t remember what she said smartass.
Cade: She posted a link to a picture of cookies that were shaped like a penguin and a groundhog.
Z: And what did we deduce from that?
Cade: I wound up cruising The LoL’s December archive.
X: Lotta stuff there, eh?
Cade: Yeah. We’ve covered some ground.
Cade: It was what was missing.
A: Which is?
Cade: Roob’s writing. I think I’ve run all her readers off.
Cade: It bothers me that her part of what we do together is prolly overlooked.
Cade: I guess I can see what she does better.
Z: And why is that?
0: Yes…why is that?
Cade: Prolly because I know what I send her vs what she posts.
X: Makes a lot of changes, eh?
Cade: Almost never.
X: Which leads us to…
Cade: She changes a LOT.
T: That makes no sense.
X: Which will bring us to…
Cade: The empty spaces that holograms/templates create…before, during, and after.
X: All at the same time?
Cade: Technically…yeah. It depends on how you look at the time.
A: What about “the before time” portion of that?
Cade: In the context of now, that thought is simultaneously both peaceful and comforting and mind-bendingly scary.
Z: Why is that?
Cade: The thought of having to try and explain it to someone.
X: Explain what?
Cade: Um…time, before time as we know it, via where we know it, as a construct for time as we know it.
X: Yer back to that “prior to now” portion of Big Bang + Big Swirl = Now.
Cade: Vectors and vectoring.
X: Like shooting a bullet with a bullet.
Cade: Lotta symbolism everywhere as to things that were, that are again.
0: And not just from “The Evil Dead Movies” perspective?
Cade: It’s everywhere.
C: What about the symbolism itself?
Cade: Layers and layering. A lot of plans within the plan.
X: But you personally feel that “the planning” aspect is overlooked in the current context.
Cade: Hey…if you can’t get your head wrapped around the concept of “The Alpha And Omega” being a pointer to “the now”…join the fucking club. It’s a difficult concept to ponder.
Z: From which end?
A: Exactly what I was thinking.
Cade: The absent nature of applicability is…erm…unpopular.
0: Indeed, you say? Not gonna read into that one.
Cade: Can’t help but read into it, that doesn’t mean that I have to entertain it.
T: And why would you not want to?
Cade: No idea who is reading this. I only know who has to edit it. 😐
X: She made a reference to Internet Filtering didn’t she?
Cade: Something like that.
X: Care to elaborate?
Cade: OK…take the user name of the following video for example.
Z: Which is what?
Cade: MrOmar Osama
X: And that is related to Mr. Jarred Harris, how?
X: Associations of what type and types via what sorts of typing methods?
Cade: Negative via Positive/Negative that leads to Negative.
X: I thought that tenets, tomes and edifices were something on which to be clung?
Cade: For how long?
X: Kinda…”leaves people out” don’t it?
Cade: Just a little.
^Benny Benassi ft. Channing – Come fly away (DJ Winn remix)^
cYa | cFa
^Shemian – Happy Swingin` (Radio Edit)^
*/rolls eyes… Definitely weird…*
10 thoughts on “Missive From ‘Merica: Splitting Apols (2)”
The first musical offering awoke a few of my remaining grey cells, so off to Y/Tube I went, and searched …… for ‘pipedream’.
Maybe I should have noted that the search term *should have been* 2 words.
Here’s what I was actually searching for:
Here’s what Y/Tube offers to innocents who omit the space …..
LikeLiked by 2 people
LikeLiked by 2 people
I would normally say (le yikes!) here…but (lay yikes!) seems more applicable.
Then I watched the vid…made it to 1:09…and now I’ll stfu. 😐
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oh but you missed the spreading and the fondling, Cade…
*No you’re right, Clicky, he didn’t miss anything, missing that…*
LikeLiked by 2 people
I like this one, which has no similarly intriguing alternatives… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUiaq_Ku4yQ
LikeLiked by 2 people
Sorry for doing this, but I feel a need to expand on something…
>>>>That said, some gaps cannot nor will not ever be filled.
Gaps are observer based observations(temporary) as to quantity. “Lack of” quantity is still a quantity…just less qualified using your current measuring stick and methods of employing it.
EX: Spaceflight. On the Apollo 11 mission, the astronauts reported seeing tiny flashes of light in their eyes on occasion while traversing space. These were later determined to be micro-meteorites that were actually striking the astronauts eyes, but were so small and traveling so fast, that they did not pose a threat to the spacecraft’s integrity nor pose a risk to the astronauts. (seeing stars eh?) When we flash forward to today, and all of the research being done to chase Neutrinos…maybe we should think about a little wider view at the same time that we are spending shitloads on all of the gadgetry.
Point being, that a space that is occupied with matter…erm…known matter of the more tangible variety…is still an empty space. It’s an empty space that is currently occupied buy something that makes the space less discernible due to its state. Like moving a rock from A to B. All four spaces remain the same, PLUS, the transitional phase of “->” in “A->B”…and don’t forget yourself and the space and spaces that you as the observer/participant occupy.
Q: They remain the same?
Do you remember where the rock was when you started? Do you better remember where the rock now is because of where it is? Or because of where it is via where it was?
Q: What about prior to?
A: (yeah…prior to your arrival)
Empty space is full.
Full space is full.
Maybe think about Neo and Agents dodging bullets in the first Matrix flick will help out with respect to intents and intentions, which should help bridge the Newtonian Laws to a freer path where they may actually belong. Afterall, if the bonds of an atom or molecule are strong enough to be classified more in terms of “what does it take to break this/these” from a scientific perspective? Yeah…the survival instinct within us starts to make more sense from the more mechanical perspective(s).
A ship is safe at port.
But that’s not what ships were built for.
So…thinking about the age at which science thinks The Universe currently resides…is it really so difficult to imagine “where blank spaces come from” under the auspices of “where does matter come from” in a less unary application of Binary/Boolean logic that relies on the existence of an opposite? Yeah…it’s there. “There” being the operative word there. (lolz) Not here.
When “the balance” tips to the “in the name of” and “for the good of” sides of logic with respect to application? If you aren’t yourself willing to go first, something is amiss. Division.
I may have mentioned this before…but there was a really good series that I watched once called “The Code” that I think helps put us on the path to a better understanding of a concept that I just proposed to Roob during a Twitter conversation. The concept is quite simple, but has the potential to be very confusing, and it is simply that something from the distant past, and something from the distant future, are equally ancient.
Thanks to Roob for her continued efforts.
The Code (2011 TV Series) – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Code_(2011_TV_series)
Enjoy!!! (I pirated the above series so I could watch it btw…tee hee)
^Meat Beat Manifesto – Prime Audio Soup (Vegetarian Soup By Boards Of Canada)^
LikeLiked by 2 people
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve been pondering Time before Time. Not sure what exactly that is if anything.
Anyway it led me to conception. And conceive in the sense of imagine.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The time aspect is important. Meaning the time to experience the experience, that has already been experienced by one and not another. Like hearing a story for the first time. God’s query to Job is a good example for me personally.
I don’t think that God was expecting Job to have an answer. Just passing along some things for Job to ponder, and in effect giving him the answers sought via what most probably consider and unorthodox manner. Thinking about the amount of time that has passed since the events described in The Book of Job, and thinking about the inspiration and effects that this tale has had on many since, I can only imagine what the spirit of Job must feel sometimes when he sees the distance of time and the ripple of these effects through it.
But I’m just one person with one perspective. Time takes time. /shrug
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks. Job is something that came up for me as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person