Hello there, Dear Reader. Glad you could join us…
*That’s rude… /lights up…*
… For a brand new missive from Cade Fon Apollyon, the Text Us Okie Devil. He and I were thoroughly engrossed in remote viewing Carl Sagan’s late 70s ‘Cosmos’ TV series at the we kenned. Although physically we’re caught up in our countries respective lockdowns, our thinking was/is free to travel unhindered…
*Sumfin’ like that…*
… and the same is true for you, Dear Reader, if you think about it 😉 Enjoy! ❤
What say we stretch our legs a bit? O wait, exercise is suddenly forbidden. I guess the Religion of Health Healthiness and The Healthy is gonna take a blow thanks to these recent developments. Gonna have to make some adjustments to existing exercise regimens, and you can bet there are people working on such plans as you read this. Gyms and spas are festering septic tanks of disease. Running is out, walking is out, being out is out, but on the upside, dogshit piles in public places is likely to be much diminished. Massage therapy is out, touch therapy is out, dating is out, prostitution is out, public gatherings are out, sports are out, and I guess pretty much any and every therapy and activity is out unless it has been much scrutinized, sterilized and approved. Sounds clean.
Q: What about next year?
A: ¿ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ?
“The flu” is a seasonal thing. This nCoV-2019 thingie appears to have cropped up/been released into the wild sometime between late October and early December, and that’s well within the range of what we here would consider the normal time to start catching the flu. So, now that this thing IS in the wild, Spring is now here and potentially could aid in this thing burning off/losing steam via the season change(s), I’m wondering about next year’s “flu season”. Like is this thing gonna pop up again next fall/winter, and are those in command are gonna shut everything down and lock everyone in prior to the holiday season?
Also concerned about our friends down in the southern hemisphere. It’s just turning fall there as we here transition to spring. Wondering now if this is likely to result in some odd mutations which may allow this thing to stay prevalent year-round. Global travel will resume at some point. It has to. Everything in our economies depends on it. Thinking a bit now how this new little gizmo can be used to get things moving and keep things moving in the direction(s) that the Bilderbergs want it to go. I mean, that’s who is running all this shiz, right? They own everything, are responsible for everything, are behind everything that happens, so whatever happens from here is all their fault.
Even the good stuff
^One Slip – Pink Floyd^
Gotta wonder if it is inappropriate for me to date an alien. I mean, I know its OK to pursue aliens of various types, in various ways because all kinds of people do that for myriads of reasons. But I’m wondering if it’s OK if I hook up with an alien. I have no idea why I’m asking your opinion on what’s best for me and my future alien girlfriend.
^R. E. A. L. M.╭ ╯Numbering Connectives^
The WHO has a mess on their hands, as do their nutritional underlings. All the Deacons of Diet, Bishops of Bite, Chaplains of Chew, Witches of Weight, Yogis of Yogurt, Gymnosophists of Grain, Houngans of Halal and Tenzos of Tofu are likely to encounter some serious issues in the running(s) of their Seminaries of Sustenance.
Supplicancy may suffer
WAIT!!! We interrupt this thoughtstream to bring you an update on something called…
Why are so goddamn many vowels in such close proximity on the keyboard? R E A L I D. It’s a something in the USA which everyone is supposed to have by October 1st of 2020? Quasi-National ID I guess. Smells like more Patriot Act bullshit. Thanks to a coupla typos tho, I’m thinking of ODs, IUDs, IEDs, and IDs.
Is it possible that “an emergency contraception device” could be considered an antipersonnel weapon?
Don’t sweat it if this rambling nonsense appears to go nowhere and/or makes no sense at all to you. It’s all unimportant stuff that means nothing.
^Underworld – Born Slippy (Alma & Mater Edit)^
Reading through that Wikipedia article on ‘Law Of Identity’, and was thinking about the “a rose is a rose” bit as I read, and it occurs to me that “rose” is only one side of the story.
We named it. We observed it and documented all of its/their features. Pretty much no thought put into what we are in relation to a rose. There also appears to be no thought given to what a rose thinks of us, nor what a rose thinks of what we think of them. But why would we give any thought to such things. A rose has no voice. It cannot communicate with us in any way, shape or form.
^Forest Drive West – Scanners^
The Isle of Man TT has been canceled. The Olympics have been canceled. All things sports have been canceled. The only thing open for business is the cancellation department. I have no idea how we are supposed to get our sport on with all this sickness. May I suggest massive media consumption in these lean times? Should get us all riled up, and we can create our own sport(s).
^Mor Elian – Paralysed Focus [FAM01]^
America's … Holistic … Plastic … Surgeon … ®
Seriously? Someone, somewhere gave this dude in the following video a registered trademark for “America’s Holistic Plastic Surgeon®”?
We love our marks.
Not stretchmarks, of course.
Yep…we love em.
We love our sport(s) too.
^Plastic Surgeon Reacts to BOTCHED – Dr. Anthony Youn^
Speaking of sport(s) and supporting sport(s) and our team(s)…
Q: Could wearing a hat which contains a logo on it be considered “taking a mark on one’s forehead”?
A: ¿? ~°╗0╔°~ ?¿
I’ve always wondered what they meant in the Bible by “taking the mark of the beast on their foreheads” or whatever, and someone recently gave me a toboggan with a giant-assed “Las Vegas” logo on it. Got me to wondering if, by wearing this hat with this logo, I was willfully putting a mark on my forehead. Will prolly be microchips in hats at some point (if there aren’t already). Lots of ways other than microchips to use hats as an identifying mark tho.
^UR – A Thousand Questions^
How bout a new iteration of SoPi?
One of the problems that I keep stumbling onto regarding The Big Bang is that there was/is only one, and that one happened once. Not to mention, that if this one big bang did in fact happen, and we are the sum total, this bang is still happening, and we are in fact not the sum total. “A” sum total, sure, but not “the” sum total.
Anyway, one of the things that I’ve long pondered is why I can go above “1” on the periodic table of elements, but I cannot go below “1”. Another thing that has bothered me is why certain things have no representation. They don’t exist. Not here anyway.
Q: Can they?
A: ? !!!VAGUERY!!! ?
Humans have evolved to the point where certain things which do not exist/occur naturally here on Earth/Terra can be created synthetically. But some stuff?
Nope. Not yet anyway
So thinking with respect to this big bang that is said to have occurred 13.7 or so billion years ago, there have been times when a something not only did not exist, it could not exist. No yet anyway. This makes me think a bit about extinct species, and causes me to correlate when certain organic and inorganic matter exists. Makes me wonder if maybe there are certain frequencies embedded within the fabric of the space and time(s) that we know, and that makes me wonder if certain things have their own period(s).
^Svreca – Ebisu (Dasha Rush Remix) [SEMANTICA44.2]^
Yeah…anti-elements. That’s kinda what I’m thinking about. Some pre-matrix or post-matrix something that allows or prohibits a something from existing. And I’m not thinking in terms of universal standards either. Way too much weird and rarefied shit going on out there that is quite localized. Basically, I’m wondering if there is something embedded within nature which allows certain things to exist or certain events to occur under certain conditions, and maybe also prohibits certain things from existing or certain events from occurring under any conditions. Sounds pretty straightforward, right? A given. All we need do is figure out what those conditions are, allowing us to create those conditions, then we can do whatever it is we need/want to do.
Q: Why do nuclear detonations contain fire?
A: I've honestly never pondered this
I assume the naturally occurring hydrogen is burning and oxygen along with it, but you’re usually talking about extraordinarily small amounts of “fuel” powering these devices, and there’s really no secondary anything in the device to burn. High explosives don’t really create fire, this isn’t Napalm, incendiary devices start fires in existing infrastructure(s), and this isn’t Hollywood using diesel or gasoline to intentionally create fireballs. So how in the hell does 50 pounds of Plutonium create a fireball? I need to look that up or something.
See what's cooking there
^ gescom – cicada^
Can exist, has not existed.
Can exist, has existed.
Cannot exist, has not existed.
Cannot exist, has existed.
Can exist, has existed, can no longer exist.
Can exist, has not existed, can exist.
Has existed, no longer exists, can never again exist.
Cannot exist, has never existed, will never exist.
Could exist, did exist, no longer exists, can no longer exist.
Could exist, does exist, will always exist, this is all there is/cannot be modified nor augmented.
Could exist, does exist, will exist as long as this lasts, once that’s gone will exist no more.
Cannot exist here, can exist there.
Can exist here, cannot exist there.
Just trying to brainstorm a bit with respect to how the galactic and/or universal regulatory agency/agencies may work. In my mind, I’m kinda using vice and vices as a model. Specifically, tobacco, alcohol and drugs. A nice mix seeing as how alcohol can be made by just about anyone, tobacco can be grown by just about anyone, and drugs can be made by just about anyone. And yet, someone else has stepped in and said “OH NO YOU DON’T!!!”. Crashed the party because they want some of the action and/or don’t want someone intruding on their own action. I can see a galactic community maybe doing something similar. More than that, I have to wonder of the Universe itself may have some embedded something which does similar and expresses itself in various ways. Maybe even does so by not expressing itself at all.
^Michal Wolski – Generator [EE11]^
‘Tis strange to contemplate the concept of having a knowledge of something that has never existed.
Even more strange to contemplate not only having knowledge of something that has never existed, but also to actively work towards prohibiting this something from ever existing.
I guess you can relate more easily regionally. Like, they may smoke crack in their house, but no one has ever smoked crack in this house, and they never will.
But in thinking in terms of being within the mind of a universal creator, thinking of things that could exist, but you adopt a position of “not on my watch”. Radioactive flying snake goats, for example.
Who the hell needs radioactive flying snake goats?
Well, besides science-fiction authors…they might could make use of radioactive flying snake goats.
^Michal Wolski – Caleidoscope [EE11]^
Was diagnosed yesterday with Retral Omniosis.
May sound humorous, however I can assure you it’s anything butt.
/ba da ching
Actually, was watching the Cosmos series earlier with a friend, and got to thinking about the orientation of Uranus relative to the rest of the planets. Sagan got to talking about Astrology, mentioned Mars’ influence on himself (or lack thereof) at the time of his own birth, and it got me to thinking about Uranus’ unusual orientation and Pluto’s unusual orbit. Since Astrology seems to be little more than sequencing (to me it does anyway), I got to thinking about that little swirl atop a soft-serve ice cream cone. Sagan had mentioned at some point that if anything ever hit Jupiter, it would simply make a hole in the clouds of Jupiter. Cosmos originally aired in 1980, and thanks to Comet Shoemaker/Levy, we now know this “hole in the clouds” idea not to be so.
Sagan also refers to Pluto as a planet, and we all know that Pluto is in fact not a planet as it has been demoted to…not a planet. What does all this add up to? Well…
SoPi-T, of course
^Melleefresh / Something Inside Me Redux (Original Mix)^
Have thought a bunch about the need to “demote” a planet from the planet category. The only two things I can think of are A) hype, B) commercialism and C) commerce.
That's three things, but who's counting
Anyway, I tend to thing of “ordering” in terms of navigation. Knowing where a something is or where a something will be provides us a pathway to plot intercepts to that something. Pluto is a pain in the ass because sometimes it’s going to be the 9th planet, and sometimes it’s going to be the 8th planet. Delete Pluto from the planetary register, and Uranus can remain firmly entrenched in the 8th spot without having to do-si-do with Pluto. Kinda makes sense. Unless you’re inbound to Sol on the solar plane instead of outbound from Sol. I may lose some of you here if you are unfamiliar with Pluto’s unusual orbit relative to our sun and the other planets.
^Biosphere – Novelty Waves (Biosphere Darkroom Mix)^
Ever listen to an expert talking about a something, but this expert sounds like a fucking moron? So which is it? Are they an expert? Or a moron? Someone gave them the expert title just so this person can prove how they don’t deserve the title.
Or it could be there's maybe just some distance between the two of you?
Two idiots who have not a clue how to communicate with one another.
^Acronym – Back to Understanding^
No idea if the space agencies of the world already have existing planetary charts which reorient the numbering of the planets relative to their position of Earth/Terra and/or Sol, but I do know that most science doesn’t appear to put any effort into explaining that Earth/Terra is not always “third stone from the sun”. Not only that, there’s apparently no effort put into explaining that Earth/Terra is sometimes both first rock, and the only rock…1 of 1. Depending on your approach/departure of course. So in that regard, why are the planets not renumbered according to their current placement and orientation within the scope of time?
A: Fear of Astrology
That’s honestly the only thing I can come up with. Religion on religion warfare. Science Vs. Every Other Religion, with a special hate of Astrology. Odd that “mathematics” is said to be the language of science, yet it is utilized only in ways that suits the monks and their methods. Destroying the very portal which allowed you to get to where you are.
^Marco Shuttle – Kinshasa Decadence [EE12]^
Numbers are failing here. “From” is our only perspective. From Sol to Infinity, all from the perspective of 3. Which makes me wonder, that if we were to apply Pi to our solar system, with Sol being “the point”, when and where would Earth/Terra be “3”? Which must be why I’m thinking that accurate mapping/charting of any system would require 360° mapping of all approaches and departures on all three axis, with consideration for a time axis along each physical axis in order to accurately calculate the numeric value of a planet or other body.
And yes, not distance, time
I would think that time would need to supersede distance(s) in order to better identify anything anomalous. Thinking this might also better assist with course alterations. Prolly doesn’t make much sense, but I’m basically stretching Pi in multiple directions relative to an object, and not just and only “around” a round object. Gonna be all kinds of crazy shapes in space, I would think.
^The Higher Intelligence Agency & Biosphere – Countdown to Darkne^
There is nothing new, it’s just new to you.
Shitloads of people dying alone is nothing new.
^A Certain Kind Of Death – Documentary^
My question is, what does she think should be done about this? I’m sure it involves creation of a process and processes which include(s) delegation. The doctor orders, others comply. If it really bothers you that much, don’t delegate, do. I know…you’re a doctor…far too busy to give care…you’ve got other patients to get to.
Q: Has it ever occurred to you that some people may want to die alone?
There may even be people out there who don’t want to die alone, realize they pretty much have no choice but to die alone, so dying alone is how it’s gonna be. All that said, it just occurs to me that if you create a system, instead of being the system, this something you create loses all of its heart.
^Too Many People (Remastered 2012)^
One of the more interesting things that Sagan has demonstrated in this Cosmos series is the use of mirrors to demonstrate infinity. Interesting in that it got me to thinking about my own experimentation(s) with mirrors whilst pondering the concept of an end to the iterations being reflective of an end to time. What I mean by that is, if you place yourself between two mirrors, you expect to see infinite reflections in these mirrors, and yet…the iterations stop. You start to count, and you only see sat 5 or ten reflections, and then nothing.
Or maybe even white or some other color. Maybe even a clear something that is nothing.
Q: Would the end of infinite reflections in a mirror be indicative of the end of time?
A: !!!! ?¿ !!!!
More than that, would the end of infinite reflection in a mirror possibly be indicative of a certain location not only in time, but space? Perhaps you are at some unknown end of a solar system. Or maybe nearing the edge of a galaxy. Perhaps too close to a black hole or a quasar or some other celestial body. Maybe even be that you are approaching the end(s) of the Universe. Or, “a” universe. Makes me wonder too about approaches. Like, do we race to the end, or does “the end” race to us. Maybe we meet halfway? A dog can only run so far into the forest.
^Mike Parker – Lustration Two (Nor’easter) (A2)^
I gotta take that thought further aloud because I’m thinking them. Primarily, mirrors might should be standard equipment on any/all spacecraft. Perhaps even a chamber full of mirrors casting infinite reflections so as to be indicative of any warping, blurring or distortions in what should otherwise be exactly what we expect to see. This is based on Sagan talking about looking for gaps (red-shift/blue-shift) in order to determine if an object is moving towards or away from your present position. But what about…
Or even White Shift? Black Shift? More than that, Purple Shift where something may appear to be moving both towards and away at the same time? Wouldn’t this possibly be indicative of a something that is actually moving faster than C/speed of light?
I gotta also wonder about “less standard” types of binary, tertiary, quaternary, etc. shifts. For example, what if red and green are shifting? Lastly, what about ultraviolet or infrared shift(s). Radio? X-ray and gamma? Null or maybe zero shift(s)? A shift should exist in some space, but it does not. There have to be some dark shifts lurking out there. Perhaps even some happening right here.
^Biosphere – Baby Interphase (Remix)^
I just got a notification on my phone from Google. April 1st of 2020 is national census day.
This should turn out well.
^natural/electronic.system. – Sicut Erat [TIKITA006]^
Science, scientists, aerospace companies and space agencies of all kinds likely already have quite complex navigation systems as well as loads of equations for calculating such things.
I don't. Not part of the club either
Might be nice for some lost someone to be able to figure out their way home all on their own.
^Alan Backdrop – Quaraman [SBCV003]^
^Revolution 9 (Remastered 2009)^
*The false start to this year reminds me of when dad died, Clicky… /stubs butt… Seemed appropriate at the time. He fuckin’ loved that race…*
*1967, the year Cade and I were born…*