Missive From ‘Merica: Shamble On!

To recap, Dear Reader – First was the preamble, followed by some ambling, so now we come to the final part of this ramble shamble of a missive mission

*There you are Clicky! Good, hear for the heavy lifting? …/pats snout… Join you in a bit, just gonna smoke this first…/lights up…*

*******

Cade impresses Roob with his gif

df60ae400197b1bd361132c78d9d81a4

9141e1e4e5b66df66d10119e5b05f171

Cade continues 1

After Eight
Sucrose
Saccharose
Saccharose
Butterfat
Fipronil
2017 Fipronil Eggs Contamination
GABA Receptor

Cade and Roob discuss the gif

256f1200ebbd5c0b57d723733aa91b38

Cade adds a wiki wall

Glutamate-gated Chloride Channels
MECHANISM OF ACTION
Glutamate-gated Chloride Receptors
Penicillin-binding Proteins
Glutamate (Neurotransmitter)
Neurotoxin
Myopathy
Tetany
Monosodium Glutamate
Wood Preservation
Chromated Copper Arsenate
Shielding Gas
Shield (Disambiguation)
Radiation
Malaria
Zika (Disambiguation)
Iodine
Iodised Salt
Iodine (Medical Use) (Redirected from Iodized oil)

The bottom of Cades wiki wall

Cade describes a chicken chase

sigma aldrich 1

sigma aldrich 2

Cade and Roob end Missive Mission Experiment

This stops here...because it does.

cYacFa

^Boards of Canada – An Eagle In Your Mind^

*******

11sexypuuqfxgi

*/looks up… Good show, Clicky! …/drags… I’ve gotta get on and write my Anthology III story now… /stubs fag… Don’t wanna be late…*

Until next time, Dear Reader… Have a Song ❤

 

 

5 thoughts on “Missive From ‘Merica: Shamble On!

  1. Some interesting bits. (for anyone interested) 🙂

    Noticed the following “irregularity”…

    …so I right-clicked the image placeholder(s), and opened in new tab…

    …then I noticed a few things…

    Looked up “ivermectin”…
    https://www.google.com/search?q=ivermectin&rlz=1C1AOHY_enUS709US709&oq=ivermectin&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.815j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
    Looks like “pet medicine” is the biggie. 😐
    However…
    Ivermectin – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivermectin
    “It is on the World Health Organization’s List of Essential Medicines, the most effective and safe medicines needed in a health system. The wholesale cost in the developing world is about US$0.12 for a course of treatment.”
    Hmmmm….that gets me to thinking about water and waters.
    Parasites and water go together like…like…parasites and water(s).
    Let’s continue on and let all that sink-in.

    ^Royksopp – Poor Leno (Jakatta mix)^


    I wasn’t able to get to the first link in that list…so…I truncated it to see what that got me.
    PAY DIRT!!!
    INTRODUCTION – https://web.stanford.edu/group/parasites/ParaSites2005/Ivermectin/
    Let’s check out the others…
    Molecule of the Month – Glutamate-gated Chloride Receptors – http://pdb101.rcsb.org/motm/191
    Molecule of the Month – Sirtuins – http://pdb101.rcsb.org/motm/213
    Molecule of the Month – Penicillin-binding Proteins – http://pdb101.rcsb.org/motm/29
    Glutamate (Neurotransmitter)Neurotoxin – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glutamate_(neurotransmitter)Neurotoxin
    So yeah…some kind of aggregation of my/our “wavy wall” and it’s contents?
    I’m missing something. Prolly everything. Meh…I’ll stay on it. Just wondering aloud.

    ^Jay Lumen & Gary Beck – Strange Fruit (Original Mix)^


    Coupla interesting definitions tho. Dunno what sparked it. 😉
    Mission – http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=mission
    Pretermit – http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=pretermit
    Preter- – http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=preter-
    Mittere – http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=mittere
    Manumission – http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=manumission
    Mitre – http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=mitre
    Miter – http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=miter
    Miter+Saw – http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=miter+saw
    Sage – http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=sage
    Sagebrush – http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=sagebrush
    Purveyor – http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=purveyor
    Purvey – http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=purvey
    So…as creators, purveyors and maintainers of the English language…
    Q: Do Brits really seem themselves as reduced to a land of people that sits around calling eachother “cunts” all fucking day and night?
    A: ?¿?
    Inquiring minds want to know. 😛

    ^The Chemical Brothers – Hey Boy Hey Girl^


    BTW, I’ve refreshed the page, and that whatever is still there. (for me it is anyway)
    Dunno.
    /me shrugs
    BTW2…
    202 Words…lolz
    First one was 115 I think?

    202
    115 +
    ——-
    317

    713 is the area code for Houston.
    317 is the area code for Indianapolis.
    Covfefe anyone? 😉
    Molar mass of co5fe2 is 406.3560 g/mol – http://www.webqc.org/molecular-weight-of-co5fe2.html
    FefeCov anyone? 😉
    Molar mass of fe2co5 is 406.3560 g/mol – http://www.webqc.org/molecular-weight-of-fe2co5.html
    Molar mass of co5fe is 350.5110 g/mol – http://www.webqc.org/molecular-weight-of-co5fe.html
    Meh.

    ^The Crystal Method – Busy Child^

    Liked by 1 person

      1. Thomas…Cleary. Why in the FUCK do I know that name?
        https://www.amazon.com/Thomas-Cleary/e/B000AP6ZLI
        J.C. Cleary, Thomas’ brother…I know that name as well.
        http://www.shambhala.com/authors/a-f/j-c-cleary.html

        Prolly yelled at one or both of them online in some forum or something.
        I hope they yelled back.
        😛

        Red Pine (Author) – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Pine_(author)
        https://www.amazon.com/Red-Pine/e/B001JP86Q0
        Moss Roberts – https://as.nyu.edu/content/nyu-as/as/faculty/moss-roberts.html
        https://www.amazon.com/Moss-Roberts/e/B001IU4N5O

        Knee Toe!!!
        THX Clicky + W&S.

        ^The KLF – Stadium House (The Trilogy) (1991)^

        Liked by 1 person

  2. Sorry for spamming your blog…but I took a minute to expand on the E=MC² bit using the magical power of MSPaint. (better than nothing…right? 😛


    That’s kinda more along the lines of what I see transpiring. Maybe someone has already figured this shit out, and…yeah…they have, but…yeah or whatever.
    Anyway…I guess what I see now is at least two different methods of speeding and/or slowing and/or maintaining/adjusting velocities, speeds, angular momentums, inertia, etc., all via that infinity-ish looking thing in the middle. So yeah, speeding up past or below “C”…and all point inbetween.

    Gotta keep in mind that there are gonna be a lot of things moving, so maybe think of it as a kind of “holding pattern” for increasing or decreasing the speed of a particle or object or whatever. Prolly some considerations to be given here to the concept of “time loops”…which this could prolly be considered one. However, keep in mind that the entirety of The Universe/creation is one big time-loop in and of itself, and it’s going be LOADING with nested loops of all kinds, shapes, sizes. What this “time-loop” really means? I dunno…I can think think of all fucking kinds of them…some being kind, and some not very kind at all.

    I was talking with my son and his gf this afternoon, and we got into a lengthy convo about “the ether” and what it is/what it is not. Neither of them were familiar with the term/concept, which I tried to relay, that them not going is a good thing/great place to start. Anyway, after dancing around it for about an hour, we got to talking about time, and I tried to explain my thoughts on the multi nature of time and times within time and times. They both asked some great questions, made some awesome observations, but there were primarily interested in resonance and vibrations, which allowed me to incorporate tics and tocs of particle and matter transitions/transitional states that all have their own resonance and vibrational frequencies, yet contribute to the overall resonance of their surroundings and The Universe.

    The example I gave, was a modulated wave with positional doppler types of resonant changes based on the observers and observed…of the concrete walkway, the grass and dirt around it, and the house/bricks on the other side of the walkway.
    The sidewalk vibrates at it’s own resonance. WAH…wah…WAH
    The grass/dirt vibrates at it’s own resonance. WAH… … …wAh… …WAH
    The house/bricks vibrates at it’s own resonance. wah…WAH…wah…WAH
    All three together also have their own resonance. WAH…wAH…wah…wAH…WAH

    That got us to particle tic(s), toc(s), tic(s)-toc(s) and toc(s)-tic(s)…
    =========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
    EX 1: Particle A has one electron, that “tics” at every +0° -> +360° rotation.
    +0° -> +359° = tic @ +360°
    =========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
    EX 2: Particle A has one electron, that “tocs” at every -0° -> -360° rotation.
    -0° -> -359° = toc @ -360°
    =========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
    EX 3: Particle B has one electron, that “tics” at every +0° -> +180° rotation, and “tocs” at every +181° -> +360° rotation.
    +0° -> +179° = tic @ +180°
    +181° -> +359° = toc @ +360°
    =========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
    EX 4: Particle B has one electron, that “tocs” at every -0° -> -180° rotation, and “tics” at every -181° -> -360° rotation.
    -0° -> -179° = toc @ -180°
    -181° -> -359° = tic @ -360°
    =========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
    EX 5: Particle C has one electron, that “tics” at every +0° -> +120° rotation, “tics” at every +121° -> +240° rotation, and “tocs” at every +241° -> +360° rotation
    +0° -> +119° = tic @ +120°
    +121° -> +239° = tic @ +240°
    +241° -> +359° = toc @ +360°
    =========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
    EX 6: Particle D has one electron, that “tocs” at every -0° -> -120° rotation, “tics” at every -121° -> -240° rotation, and “tocs” at every -241° -> -360° rotation
    -0° -> -119° = toc @ -120°
    -121° -> -239° = tic @ -240°
    -241° -> -359° = toc @ -360°
    =========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
    Result 1 = 1-tic
    Result 2 = 1-toc
    Result 3 = 1-tic + 1-toc = 1 tic-toc
    Result 4 = 1-toc + 1-tic = 1 toc-tic
    Result 5 = 1-tic + 1-tic + 1-toc = 1 tic-tic-toc
    Result 6 = 1-toc + 1-tic + 1-toc = 1 toc-tic-toc
    =========== =========== =========== =========== ===========

    I dunno…maybe this is also a method of creating, maintaining or breaking/separating entanglements more along the lines of something more tangible to science/scientists. But this is me and my shitty bullshit…so prolly not. So yeah…threads and threading via mass and masses that may…erm…not yet be accurately represented in their totality due to time and times over time. As in, two particles in the same thread/string, where one has arrived at a certain space in time at a certain time, and one has not. Or maybe even, that yeah, one has arrived and gone, and this is the second of two. Also may want to consider, that sometimes…particle one and particle two may arrive at EXACTLY the same time in the same space, but are currently heading in different directions. Also, they may sometimes appear to be occupying the same space at the same time, yet are not. Plus, they may be occupying the same space at the same time and NOT occupying the same space at the same time…both at the same time. May make no sense, but yeah…it does.
    /shrug

    There was all kinds of crazy tic(s) and toc(s) variations that I described to them to account for/address those “less standard times” that are nested/embedded within the fabric of “more standard time”. I was tempted to adjust the singular nature of that last instance of time in the previous sentence, but I did not, and thinking about it now, that may help a shade with contextual observer(s) and their relationships and relating.
    All kinds of times and timekeepers.

    I just know that they both talk about this shit a lot on their own, asked me a lot of very scary questions/things that they have concerns about, and they are both sharp as shit. But yeah, they seem to be thinking about some scary concepts of science and the directions that it seems to be heading. So, I brought up and explained the concept of “tapping and harnessing”…and that seemed to set their mind at ease a bit. I’ll spare you/anyone else that analogy here.

    OH!!! And we addressed “infinite reducibility” and I explained why I personally think that it is absolutely possible. Contextually anyway.
    EX: Grab a hammer, choose your target, start banging. When you get to a part that will no longer divide, get a bigger fucking hammer. You’ll eventually find the end. Or it will find you. Or both.

    Thanks for giving me a place to…do whatever it is that I do. 😉

    ^Blue Rhino propane factory explosion^

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment